🔗 Share this article

Thhese days exhibit a quite unusual phenomenon: the first-ever US parade of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the identical objective – to stop an Israeli breach, or even devastation, of Gaza’s unstable ceasefire. Since the war finished, there have been scant days without at least one of the former president's delegates on the scene. Just recently featured the likes of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all coming to perform their roles.

Israel occupies their time. In only a few days it initiated a set of strikes in Gaza after the loss of two Israeli military troops – leading, according to reports, in dozens of Palestinian casualties. Multiple ministers urged a restart of the conflict, and the Knesset enacted a early resolution to take over the occupied territories. The American reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the US leadership appears more concentrated on preserving the current, tense period of the peace than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it appears the United States may have aspirations but no tangible strategies.

At present, it remains unknown when the proposed global administrative entity will truly take power, and the same applies to the proposed military contingent – or even the composition of its personnel. On Tuesday, Vance declared the US would not force the structure of the international unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject one alternative after another – as it did with the Ankara's offer this week – what happens then? There is also the contrary question: which party will establish whether the troops supported by Israel are even prepared in the mission?

The matter of how long it will take to demilitarize the militant group is similarly unclear. “Our hope in the leadership is that the multinational troops is going to at this point assume responsibility in disarming Hamas,” stated the official lately. “That’s may need some time.” Trump only highlighted the uncertainty, declaring in an interview on Sunday that there is no “fixed” deadline for the group to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unknown participants of this yet-to-be-formed global contingent could arrive in the territory while the organization's fighters still hold power. Would they be dealing with a leadership or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the concerns emerging. Others might question what the result will be for ordinary residents as things stand, with the group carrying on to focus on its own adversaries and opposition.

Recent events have afresh underscored the gaps of Israeli journalism on each side of the Gaza border. Every source strives to examine every possible aspect of the group's infractions of the peace. And, typically, the situation that Hamas has been hindering the return of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has taken over the news.

On the other hand, coverage of non-combatant casualties in Gaza resulting from Israeli attacks has obtained minimal focus – or none. Take the Israeli counter strikes following a recent southern Gaza occurrence, in which two troops were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s officials reported 44 fatalities, Israeli media commentators criticised the “moderate response,” which targeted only installations.

That is nothing new. Over the recent weekend, the press agency accused Israel of infringing the truce with Hamas 47 occasions after the truce came into effect, causing the death of dozens of Palestinians and wounding an additional many more. The assertion seemed insignificant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was just absent. This applied to reports that eleven individuals of a Palestinian family were lost their lives by Israeli soldiers last Friday.

The civil defence agency reported the group had been attempting to return to their home in the Zeitoun district of Gaza City when the bus they were in was fired upon for supposedly crossing the “demarcation line” that marks zones under Israeli army command. This limit is unseen to the ordinary view and shows up just on charts and in official documents – not always accessible to everyday individuals in the territory.

Even this incident hardly rated a note in Israeli journalism. A major outlet covered it briefly on its website, citing an Israeli military spokesperson who explained that after a suspicious transport was detected, forces discharged warning shots towards it, “but the vehicle kept to approach the troops in a manner that created an direct threat to them. The forces shot to remove the threat, in compliance with the truce.” Zero fatalities were reported.

Amid such framing, it is little wonder numerous Israelis think Hamas exclusively is to responsible for infringing the peace. This perception risks fuelling appeals for a stronger approach in Gaza.

Sooner or later – maybe in the near future – it will not be enough for all the president’s men to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, advising the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need